Pauline Hanson’s visit to a Sikh gurdwara in Canning Vale has given Australia a real-life example of what her controversial “monoculture” argument could mean when taken beyond the slogans and political noise.

Within days of debate over Hanson’s call for Australia to be “multiracial” but “monocultural”, the One Nation leader appeared at the Sikh Temple Perth complex in Canning Vale, wearing a head covering, meeting Sikh community members and taking part respectfully in one of Australia’s most visible multicultural spaces.

For many of her critics, the visit may appear contradictory.

How can a politician who questions multiculturalism walk into a gurdwara, honour Sikh customs and stand beside a community whose faith, language, dress and traditions are proudly distinct?

But there is another way to read the moment.

Perhaps this is exactly what Hanson means when she says Australia should have one culture: not one religion, not one language, not one food, not one ethnicity, but one shared civic culture built on respect, law, equality, service and national belonging.

The video supplied to The Australia Today shows Hanson at Western Australia’s Canning Vale gurdwara, where she is seen with community members outside the temple and later inside the premises wearing a blue head covering.

Inside the gurdwara, she appears in the prayer hall area and later among community members in the langar hall, where Sikh volunteers serve free vegetarian meals to all visitors regardless of faith, background, wealth or political views.

That image is powerful.

A Queensland senator known for her hardline views on immigration and national identity walks into a Sikh gurdwara in Western Australia and follows the rules of the house. She covers her head. She shows respect. She engages with elders. She stands in a place where faith and service are central to community life.

That is not exclusion.

That is participation.

For Hanson’s supporters, the visit may be seen as proof that her argument is not against people of different races or faiths, but against division, separatism and the idea that Australia should become a collection of disconnected cultural enclaves.

The gurdwara visit challenges the simplistic claim that wanting one national culture automatically means rejecting migrant communities.

In fact, the Indian community offers one of the clearest examples of how cultural identity and Australian belonging can sit together.

Indian Australians have built businesses, served in public life, joined the defence forces, worked in transport, health, farming, education and small business, and contributed deeply to local communities across the country.

Their temples are not isolated spaces. They are centres of prayer, charity, education and service. Langar is not just a religious meal; it is a public act of equality. Anyone can sit. Anyone can eat. No one is turned away.

If the core of Australian culture is fairness, service, dignity, respect for the law and helping your neighbour, then Indian Australians are not outside that culture. They are living it.

That is why Hanson’s Canning Vale visit matters.

It shows that the monoculture debate does not have to be reduced to fear or hostility. It can also open a more serious question: what is the common Australian culture that holds people together?

A common culture does not require everyone to pray the same way, dress the same way or eat the same food. Australia is not stronger when people are forced to erase their heritage. It is stronger when different communities are united by shared values.

The gurdwara itself is a perfect example.

Everyone entering follows the same basic rules. Cover your head. Remove your shoes. Show respect. Sit together. Eat together. Serve others. No one is asked to abandon who they are, but everyone is expected to honour the shared code of the place.

That is a form of common culture.

And it is not weak. It is disciplined, respectful and inclusive.

This is where the national debate often becomes dishonest. Too many people pretend there are only two choices: either unlimited multiculturalism with no common identity, or forced assimilation where migrants must hide their heritage.

Most Australians live somewhere in between.

They want migrants to contribute, respect the law, embrace democratic values, speak to their neighbours and feel part of the country. But they also understand that someone can be fully Australian while still being Sikh, Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Buddhist or of no faith at all.

They understand that a turban, a temple, a language, a festival or a community kitchen does not make someone less Australian.

The question is not whether people look or worship the same. The question is whether they share a commitment to the country they call home.

Seen through that lens, Hanson’s visit to the Canning Vale gurdwara becomes more than a political photo opportunity. It becomes a test case for her own argument.

If her monoculture means one race, one religion or one old version of Australia, then it will fail in a modern country built by many communities.

But if her monoculture means one national loyalty, one rule of law, one democratic standard, one expectation of mutual respect and one commitment to Australia’s future, then the gurdwara visit shows that people of all backgrounds can be included in it.

That is the version of the debate Australians deserve.

Because the Sikh community did not need to stop being Sikh to welcome Pauline Hanson.

And Pauline Hanson did not need to stop being Pauline Hanson to respectfully enter a Sikh gurdwara.

Both things happened at once.

That may be uncomfortable for critics on both sides, but it also says something important about Australia.

The country is at its best when communities are confident enough to share their traditions and strong enough to unite around common values.

If that is what Hanson means by monoculture, then the Canning Vale gurdwara visit may be one of the clearest examples yet that the idea does not have to exclude everyone.

It can include everyone willing to respect Australia, contribute to Australia and belong to Australia.

Support our Journalism

No-nonsense journalism. No paywalls. Whether you’re in Australia, the UK, Canada, the USA, or India, you can support The Australia Today by taking a paid subscription via Patreon or donating via PayPal — and help keep honest, fearless journalism alive.