Budget cuts threaten US strategy against rising Chinese influence in Indo-Pacific

The proposed appropriations bill for the State Department would cut its budget by 11% to about U.S. $52 billion a year from nearly $60 billion this year, and falls short of the White House’s 2025 request for $64 billion.

By Alex Willemyns for RFA

Cuts to the U.S. State Department’s 2025 budget proposed by the House of Representatives would be “deadly” and “devastating” to American efforts to counter China’s growing power in the Indo-Pacific region, two senior diplomats told Congress on Thursday.

As part of a cost-cutting campaign, the Republican-led House is pushing appropriations bills that significantly differ from requests made by the Biden administration, including apparent proposals to remove Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s annual salary entirely.

- Advertisement -

The proposed appropriations bill for the State Department would cut its budget by 11% to about U.S. $52 billion a year from nearly $60 billion this year, and falls short of the White House’s 2025 request for $64 billion.

It would, for instance, provide only $108 million in funding for U.S.-led international development projects, rather than the $544 million requested by the Biden administration, and only $4 million for global economic support, instead of the $204 million requested.

Testifying before the House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on the Indo-Pacific, Assistant U.S. Secretary of State for East Asia and the Pacific Daniel Kritenbrink said the proposals would hamstring U.S. efforts to counter China’s growing footprint in the region.

“These cuts would be devastating,” Kritenbrink said. “It would be devastating to our ability to stand up to China [and] devastating to our ability to continue to offer alternatives to our partners.”

“We have to be able to deliver tangible benefits and alternatives in infrastructure investments and connectivity,” he said, explaining that countries were assessing their relationships with the United States and China on the basis of which was providing more “practical benefits.”

“Also, cuts to the diplomatic engagement funding would cause us, potentially, to have to reduce our staffing and presence in the region at the time we should be stepping it up,” Kritenbrink added.

- Advertisement -

The White House has said it “strongly opposes” the proposed budget cuts. It issued a statement on Monday that accused House Republicans of “wasting time with partisan bills” meant to appeal to their base.

The “sharp reductions” would “hinder the ability to successfully implement these programs in the Indo-Pacific region, erode the U.S. diplomatic presence around the globe, and cede diplomatic and development ground to the People’s Republic of China,” it said.

Yet House Republicans have defended the proposal.

House Appropriations Committee Chair Tom Cole, a Republican from Oklahoma, called the proposed budget cut an effort to slash needless spending by America’s diplomatic bureaucracy.

“This bill prioritizes our national security and reduces wasteful spending,” Cole said in a statement on Monday.

But at the hearing on Thursday, Michael Schiffer, the assistant administrator for Asia at the U.S. Agency for International Development, said the cuts would reverse hard-earned inroads into countering China’s high-spending diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific.

The aid agency had just reopened a Pacific mission in Fiji and an office in Papua New Guinea, he noted, and was striving to make its presence in the region as well-known as Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative.

“It would be absolutely deleterious,” he said. “It would be deadly.”

Radio Free Asia (RFA), a news service affiliated with RFA, produced this report.

Disclaimer: This article was originally published as “US diplomats: Budget cuts would be ‘devastating’ and ‘deadly’in Benar News and is re-published here with the editor(s)’ kind permission. The views expressed in this article are those of the original author and do not necessarily reflect the views of our publication. We are not responsible for any errors or omissions in the content. For the original version and more stories, please visit Benar News.

Support Our Journalism

Global Indian Diaspora and Australia’s multicultural communities need fair, non-hyphenated, and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. The Australia Today – with exceptional reporters, columnists, and editors – is doing just that. Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, the United States of America, or India you can take a paid subscription by clicking Patreon and support honest and fearless journalism.