It’s time we stopped exploiting interns and pay them for the hours worked

It may also displace paid employment and undermine labour standards, as employers replace paid workers with a revolving door of interns who are treated as “cheap dead-end labour”.

By Anne Hewitt

Many people, at some stage in their search for a career, have worked for free in return for some much-valued experience. But it’s surprisingly hard to find exact numbers.

A 2016 national survey of 3,800 Australians found more than half (58%) of respondents aged 18 to 29 and more than a quarter (26%) aged 30 to 64 had done unpaid work at least once in the previous five years.

- Advertisement -

There is also data suggesting more than a third (37.4%) of Australia’s university students are doing courses that involve real work as part of their tertiary studies. In 2017 that amounted to 451,263 work-related learning experiences.

This is not uniquely Australian. In 2013 an EU survey of 12,921 people found 46% aged from 18 to 35 had done at least one internship, with more than half of those being unpaid.

Representative picture of Intern: Image Source: @CANVA
Representative picture of Intern: Image Source: @CANVA

Why people are prepared to work for free

So why are so many people around the world signing up to do unpaid jobs, in the guise of traineeships, internships or work experience?

One reason must be the strong promotion of internships as a step from education to employment. Employers have frequently identified practical experience as an important factor in deciding who to hire.

Internships have also been enthusiastically endorsed by many universities plus industry and government as a way to help students develop relevant skills to move into the graduate labour market.

Representative picture of Intern: Image Source: @CANVA
Many Australian students do unpaid work in the hope of securing work in their preferred careers. Representative picture of Intern: Image Source: @CANVA

With these groups backing internships, is it any wonder so many students and graduates believe an internship is essential to securing graduate employment?

- Advertisement -

But there’s a downside to internships stakeholders are reluctant to discuss.

Not everyone can get an internship

When internships are either a prerequisite for professional accreditation or pseudo-mandatory – you can’t get a job without one – then only those who have completed a placement can enter the profession.

Those who can’t afford to do unpaid work or lack the connections to secure a placement may be left behind. This can be a tragedy for the individual, whose dreams of working in a particular industry might be dashed.

As well, the proliferation of unpaid (or low-paid) internships has the potential to have a much broader impact. It risks entrenching existing disadvantages and limiting diversity in professions.

Representative picture of Intern: Image Source: @CANVA
Unlike in the EU, trainees in Australia have very few entitlements. Representative picture of Intern: Image Source: @CANVA

It may also displace paid employment and undermine labour standards, as employers replace paid workers with a revolving door of interns who are treated as “cheap dead-end labour”.

This is not a theoretical concern, there is evidence some of Australia’s tertiary students face obstacles that limit their capacity to secure or complete internships.

This includes disadvantaged students, including those from low socio-economic backgrounds, rural areas, those who are Indigenous and others who cannot do work placements required to get professional accreditation.

These poor outcomes are driving calls for reform. The European parliament recently endorsed a proposal to amend the 2014 Quality Framework for Traineeships requiring all trainees in EU countries to be fairly remunerated.

What is being done to regulate internships

On top of this, a growing number of countries have increasingly tough regulations regarding internships. For example, France banned open-market internships in 2014, and now only allows regulated internships that are completed by a university student as part of their studies.

The French regulation sets out stringent supervision requirements from both the workplace hosts and the university and obligations for payment when the internship exceeds a set period. Belgium, Estonia, Italy, Lithuania, Portugal and Slovenia have also implemented specific laws requiring payment for open market traineeships.

The EU’s response to concerns about unpaid internships highlights the need for Australia to consider its position.

Currently, Australian regulations fail to regulate internships in any comprehensive way.

Instead, there are piecemeal rules dealing with isolated issues such as protecting interns against discrimination or harassment or ensuring universities’ internship courses meet set standards.

While these issues are important, dealing with them in isolation does not resolve the broad and complex issues internships raise.

Representative picture of Intern: Image Source: @CANVA
Representative picture of Intern: Image Source: @CANVA

The Future of unpaid work

Most stakeholders value internships so they are likely to continue. Therefore, we need to consider how they can be regulated to reduce negative outcomes and maximise the benefits. This will require a national debate to answer a range of difficult questions, including:

• what do we think the value of work is, and what is the impact of allowing unpaid work on individuals and society? Are we prepared to accept this impact?

• who should pay for training and skills development: individuals, employers, or society?

• who in our workplaces should be protected by labour laws and who should be excluded?

Once we have these answers, we can decide what the role of internships in Australia should be, and craft a regulatory regime to achieve that. Perhaps our conclusion should be, as articulated by the EU parliament, that it’s time we stopped exploiting interns and paid them a fair day’s pay.

Anne Hewitt, Associate Professor, Law, University of Adelaide

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.