Victoria’s state election campaign has begun not with a new policy, but with unease — and that unease is increasingly visible in the posture of Premier Jacinta Allan as she confronts a markedly different opponent in Opposition Leader Jess Wilson.

After more than a decade in power, Labor is accustomed to framing elections as referendums on stability versus risk. What appears to have unsettled the government this time is not simply Liberal policy, but the political style, pace and credibility of its new leader — a factor that has begun to alter media narratives, voter engagement and internal Labor rhetoric.

A campaign launched on the defensive

Premier Allan’s speech to Labor colleagues this week formally launched the government’s election campaign, but its tone revealed more anxiety than confidence. Rather than unveiling a bold forward agenda, the Premier returned to familiar terrain: warnings of Liberal cuts, budget “black holes” and associations with political extremes.

Central to her argument was a claimed $11.2 billion funding gap under a Wilson-led government — a figure the Opposition strongly disputes. Allan’s repeated emphasis on cuts, chaos and instability echoed Labor’s long-running strategy against previous Liberal leaders. The difference this time is that Wilson does not neatly fit the caricature Labor has relied upon.

The Premier’s rhetoric has sharpened noticeably since Wilson assumed the Liberal leadership in November. References to “misinformation conventions”, “cosying up to One Nation”, and a “Liberal National One Nation circus” mark a deliberate attempt to frame Wilson early as ideologically risky rather than reformist.

Yet critics argue the aggression reflects a government struggling to recalibrate its message against a leader who is neither internally divisive nor easily dismissed.

The misinformation flashpoint

That tension escalated during recent bushfire events, when the Premier suggested Wilson had remained in her office rather than visiting affected communities — a claim the Opposition labelled false and misleading.

Media scrutiny quickly followed, with journalists and community leaders questioning the accuracy of the assertion. Wilson countered by detailing her regional engagements and accusing the Premier of politicising disaster response.

The episode proved significant not because of its scale, but because of what it revealed. For a government that has often criticised misinformation in federal politics, the suggestion that it may have mischaracterised the Opposition Leader’s actions proved damaging. It reinforced a growing perception that Labor, under pressure, is leaning into attack rather than precision.

That tension spilled into a public dispute over bushfire management and Country Fire Authority (CFA) funding, further sharpening the contrast between the two leaders. The flashpoint came after the release of the CFA’s annual report, which Jess Wilson said exposed inconsistencies between the government’s public assurances and the reality facing frontline services during an active fire season.

Wilson accused the Premier of failing to be “honest with Victorians” about resourcing levels, arguing that communities and volunteers deserved clarity at a time when bushfire risks were intensifying across regional Victoria.

Premier Jacinta Allan strongly rejected the claims, accusing the Opposition of politicising natural disasters and misrepresenting CFA funding. The government maintains that overall emergency management funding has increased and says operational pressures during fire events should not be conflated with budget cuts. However, the exchange has fuelled wider media scrutiny, with commentators questioning whether Labor’s messaging aligns with official documents.

The spat has become emblematic of the broader campaign dynamic: Wilson leveraging transparency and regional credibility to build momentum, while Allan is forced onto the defensive, reinforcing perceptions of a government under pressure as bushfire season collides with an increasingly contested election year.

Political analysts note that such moments carry heightened risk late in a government’s lifecycle, when credibility — not just policy — becomes decisive.

Why Jess Wilson is gaining traction

Wilson’s rise has disrupted established assumptions about Victoria’s electoral dynamics. At 34, she represents generational change in a state where political leadership has long been dominated by older figures with deep factional roots.

Her approach has been markedly different from her predecessors. Rather than launching wholesale ideological battles, Wilson has focused on cost-of-living pressures, regional infrastructure, public safety and transparency — issues polling suggests resonate strongly in outer suburban and regional seats.

She has also embraced visibility. Frequent regional visits, direct media engagement and disciplined messaging have allowed her to project energy and accessibility, particularly in contrast to a government weighed down by record debt, infrastructure overruns and public sector fatigue.

Crucially, Wilson has avoided internal conflict. After years of Liberal leadership churn, her early consolidation of party unity has denied Labor one of its most effective attack lines.

Media tone and polling pressure

Recent media coverage reflects this shift. While Allan once enjoyed largely managerial scrutiny, reporting has increasingly focused on Labor’s vulnerabilities: falling primary vote, dissatisfaction over crime, frustration with service delivery, and exhaustion after 11 years of single-party rule.

Polling shows Labor’s primary support declining, particularly in mortgage-stressed outer suburban electorates. These are precisely the areas Wilson has targeted, framing the election as a choice between renewal and stagnation rather than ideology.

The Premier’s own campaign speech acknowledged headwinds — record debt, infrastructure blowouts and community concern over safety — but offered few new policy commitments to counter them. Instead, the emphasis was on defending Labor’s record and warning against change.

That strategy, analysts argue, risks underestimating an electorate increasingly open to listening to an alternative — even if it remains cautious about embracing it.

A contrast in leadership styles

The emerging contest is less about left versus right than about continuity versus change. Allan represents institutional experience and policy continuity; Wilson represents disruption, clarity and responsiveness.

Where the Premier leans on scale and incumbency, the Opposition Leader leans on relatability and pace. Where Labor emphasises fear of cuts, Wilson emphasises accountability and delivery.

The Premier’s intensified attacks suggest she recognises this contrast — and the danger it poses. Political veterans note that governments typically escalate rhetoric when they sense narrative control slipping.

An election still Labor’s to lose — but no longer routine

Labor remains the favourite. The Liberals must reclaim 16 seats to form government — a formidable task rarely achieved in Victoria. But the certainty that once surrounded Labor’s re-election has softened.

What has changed is not just polling, but momentum. Wilson has reframed the contest from inevitability to possibility. That alone marks a shift.

For Allan, the challenge is strategic as much as electoral: whether to continue prosecuting a campaign rooted in warning and attack, or to reassert leadership through renewed policy ambition and disciplined messaging.

As the campaign unfolds, one thing is clear. Victoria’s election is no longer a formality. And the Premier’s increasingly combative posture suggests she knows it.

Support our Journalism

No-nonsense journalism. No paywalls. Whether you’re in Australia, the UK, Canada, the USA, or India, you can support The Australia Today by taking a paid subscription via Patreon or donating via PayPal — and help keep honest, fearless journalism alive.